Review Process

a)The manuscript is original and does not violate any copyright or intellectual property rights.

b) All sources, citations, and third-party materials used in the manuscript are properly credited.

c) The manuscript follows all applicable ethical and professional standards.

d) The author agrees to the terms of this Agreement before the manuscript is published.

Manuscript Preparation

The author must complete the manuscript, follow the format guidelines, and ensure that it is original.

Initial Screening

The manuscript must be submitted to the publishing team with the following sections: Title Page, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Objectives,Methodology, Results, Conclusion, Recommendations, and Author Bio.

The abstract must not exceed 250 words. The total length of the manuscript, including the abstract, must not exceed 5,000 words.

Editorial Screening

Initial review of Editorial Board

Accepted of peer review
Return for revision or rejected

Peer Review Process

The manuscript will be screened by two peer reviewers using either a single-blind or double-blind review process.

The reviewers will provide feedback and comments to help determine whether the manuscript will be accepted, revised, or rejected.

The review process takes 2 to 3 days

Revision and Re-submit

The editorial team will send a letter to the author informing them of the reviewer's decision. If revisions are required, the author will need to resubmit the revised manuscript.

Editing and proofreading before final publication

The manuscript undergoes review, checking of grammar. reference checking, layout, checking ethical and plagiarism policy before finalization to print and digital publishing with ISSN, and assigned indexing

Peer Review

Step 1: Initial Screening

The Editorial Board evaluates the manuscript for scope, originality, and adherence to submission guidelines.

Step 4: Review Decision

Accept without revision
Accept with minor revisions
Revise and resubmit (major revisions)
Reject

Step 2: Reviewer Assignment

Each manuscript is assigned to at least two (2) independent reviewers with expertise in the subject area.

Step 5: Revision Process

Authors are required to address reviewer comments and submit a revised manuscript within the given timeframe.

Step 3: Evaluation Criteria

Originality and contribution to the field
Methodological rigor
Clarity and organization
Relevance and significance

List of Reviewer

The Reviewer is composed of distinguished educators and scholars from various academic institutions.

Dr. Jonel Espalto from the Polytechnic University of the Philippines holds a Doctor of Philosophy, major in Filipino.

Dr. Romeo Pilongo of the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Marikina earned his Doctor of Philosophy in Education, major in Educational Leadership and Management.

Dr. Geremy Sanchez, representing Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College, holds a Doctor of Philosophy, major in English.

Ms. Divine Grace Pagal from Rizal Technological University has obtained a Master of Arts in Literature and Language Instruction.

Mr. Marnel Caga, affiliated with both the Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Pasig and the University of Makati, holds a Master of Arts in Education, major in Filipino.

Dr. Carlo N Romero of the Polytechnic University of the Philippines, holds a Doctor of Technology Education